On the afternoon of Sunday, July 20, I attended a rally on Miami's
Biscayne Boulevard in support of besieged citizens in Gaza, where, in
the course of the last several weeks, the government of Israeli president Benjamin Netanyahu has
slaughtered over 2,000 Palestinians, the majority of
them civilians, including hundreds of
children. The pretext was for this
attack was the
appalling kidnap and murder of 3 Israeli teens in the
West Bank, but the result was an ethnic slaughter of which Slobodan Milošević would have been proud. As a U.S.voter and taxpayer, when my country provides billions of dollars of
aid a year to enable such as policy, I feel it is my duty to speak up.
The rally itself was relatively
uneventful as these things go, but what transpired since was
illustrative to me about the rather sorry state of the media here in the
United States at this time, and here in Miami in particular.
The
protest was scheduled for around 3pm and I stood in front of the
Israeli consulate. Two others arrived, one Palestinian, one Jewish, and
then finally another man, a somewhat jittery fellow with a keffiyeh
around his neck and a small camcorder also showed up. After standing in
front of the consulate for a few minutes, we collectively realized the
rally was in fact to be held at the Torch of Friendship and not at the
consulate, so we ambled across Biscayne Boulevard to join the others
assembled.
Shortly after we arrived, indicating the man in the
kaffiyah, someone announced "This man is a Zionist [they did not say
"Jew"] and he is here filming us to put it up on his Zionist website."
At
this, a handful, I would say perhaps 4 to 5 people in a crowd that
would eventually number about 200, started yelling at the man, who
started yelling back at them. The man with the camcorder behaved in a fairly aggressive way, getting to within inches of the faces of
the demonstrators and, it looked to my eyes, as if he might be trying to provoke some
sort of physical confrontation in order to film it. However, having been
around unstable types before in my work as a journalist in conflict
zones, something about the man's demeanour alarmed me. At one point I
advised the crowd "If you react, he wins" and "Don't take the bait."
Some however did, and engaged in prolonged back and forths with the
man which involved some shoving. At this point, I wandered off to another part of the demonstration.
A
few minutes later the police showed up, took the man to the side and
extracted off his person and put on the hood of their squad car for all
the world to see a very large handgun. When the footage the man shot was
later put online, it was revealed that he was a member of a Lake Worth,
Florida-based group called United West, an organization
designated as
an "Anti-Muslim hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law Center civil
rights group. Some demonstrators later told me that they had recognized that he was armed.
Whether or not the man was trying to provoke a
fight with the the protesters I cannot say. The man eventually went away, and I stayed at the protest for about two
hours, joined, at one point, by a Moroccan and a Czech friend. They
demonstrators chanted "Let's go Gaza" some slogans in Arabic I didn't
understand and some chanted "Let's Go Hamas," which, in the context of
the rally, seemed to me a statement of support for resistance to
Israel's savaging of Gaza's population. For the record, as an avowed secularist, I do not support religiously-based parties, but, then again, it is not my place to tell people in other countries who they are and aren't allowed to vote for, no matter how ill-advised I may think their choice may be.
There were lots of young
people at the protest, quite a few old people and quite a few toddlers as well. There were Arabs, Muslims, Christians, Jews, Latinos, basically a cross-section of different groups one finds in South Florida. A group
of pro-Israel protesters - about half a dozen - also showed up, waving
an Israeli flag and hurling what sounded like invective in Hebrew that
I, at least, couldn't understand. Police kept the two groups well apart.
I saw no physical altercations or actual violent acts on the part of
either side for the two hours I was there.
I posted photos of some of the protest on my blog
here.
A
few days later, I was made aware of a blog
post on the Miami Herald's
website by a journalist named Marc Caputo, whom I had never heard of
before but who is apparently the Herald's chief political reporter [Florida's ossified, corrupt political scene holds little interest for me, I
generally turn to the Herald for its alas dwindling foreign coverage].
The Herald had published extensive coverage of a pro-Israel
rally in
Miami Beach that same week. To the best of my knowledge, Caputo's
blog post was the only mention of the Gaza rally that appeared in the
paper or on its website.
In the post, which didn't generally fall dramatically to either a pro-Israel or pro-Palestine slant, the author alluded to how the video I saw being shot that day was picked up by the extreme right-wing news source
Breitbart.com, which described the video with the words that a "Jewish
reporter had been working undercover and was identified, then attacked
by the demonstrators," which, as noted, is completely false. Caputo then quoted me
by name from a comment I had made on the event's Facebook page about
being proud to stand with the people of Gaza and my query who the armed
provocateur was, before concluding "as with any dispute rooted in the
Middle East, it’s tough to tell who did what exactly, who started it,
who’s more at fault and what the ultimate truth is. The video posted by
The United West is edited. We don’t know the whole story. But we
probably never will."
Caputo never made any attempt to contact me
or, as far as I can tell, anyone else connected to the event, anyone
who could have told him the cameraman from United West and the gunmen
were one and the same. As
neither Caputo nor any other journalist for the Herald had attended the rally, they missed making the connection that the man
shooting the video and the man who had gun taken off him and
registration checked by the police were the same person. To me, this
seemed like a detail worth clarifying.
I wrote first to a
Herald editor whom I had met and corresponded
with before, explaining the situation and he thoughtfully put me in
touch with the journalist in question.
Initially, Caputo was not receptive to this new information, and instead responded in a highly pompous, defensive and verbose tone that rather surprised me, but agreeing to contact the
police to confirm my story that the cameraman was armed and that police
had removed a firearm from him during the demonstration (I never said
the man was arrested). I also found an additional attendee who confirmed
my version of the story. The man apparently had a concealed weapons permit but, to me and others at the demonstration, at least, that doesn't make his behavior any less threatening.
At the conclusion of our exchange,
Caputo wrote that "I think I'll do both: update and issue a separate
post. The armed man is unreported and for search purposes on the
Internet deserves a separate headline."
Had he done so, that would have been that. But up to this date (22 August 2014), however, Caputo has done neither, hence what I viewed as the necessity of this posting. This is a detail that should be known. The Miami Herald, likewise, has, as far as I can tell, made no public acknowledgement of this glaring omission. They have had this information for a month and have chosen, for whatever reason, not to share it with the public. What has resulted is another instance in which the
U.S. media can blithely paint. perhaps not even intentionally, those
defending the human rights of Palestinian civilians as sympathetic or
tangentially connected to violence and terrorism.
Though the Miami
Herald is significantly diminished from the days when it was one of the
world's great newspapers - with the gaping, destroyed facade of the
publication's former home in downtown Miami providing some unflattering
symbolism - there are still some fine reporters there, and it's a paper I have been happy to contribute articles to, both from
abroad and here in Miami, from time to time over the years. But if
friends of mine such as the great Irish photographer
Andrew McConnell, who I reported with from the
Democratic Republic of Congo,
can cobble together their own often meagre resources to get into Gaza
itself and cover the violence there, is it too much to expect a Miami
Herald reporter to get into their air conditioned car and drive a couple
of miles to town to cover a demonstration that they will later write
about? Now that the Herald has moved from its downtown offices in the
heart of Miami to the antiseptic and distant suburb of Doral, it is in ever more
danger of being cut off from the people of the city it claims to cover
authoritatively.
The temptation to sit behind a desk in an office with minimal effort, tweeting and blogging away, is great but, even in this
digital age, reporters must go out among the people and, well, report.
If journalists want to wade into international reporting on fraught geopolitical issues such as this one, simply sighing those
issues are "complex" does not cut it.
The Miami Herald failed the people of Miami and the people of Gaza in this instance.
These are matters of life and death.
Either do it right, or don't do it at all.